| Cranbrook Academy
of Art graduate students, Patrick Gavin and Jonathan
Muecke, create objects that explore the human relationship
with the physical world, including space, division, and boundaries.
Works in New Physical Consequences include objects that
intend to orchestrate relationships or instigate the recognition
of boundaries amongst and between things and people, as well as
pieces that invite reflection on the most basic ways humans interact
with materials and physical reality.
Gavin, who studied furniture
design at Rhode Island School of Design and developed his technical
skills at both an engineering consultancy and a furniture manufacturing
company, explores boundaries, physical space and the interaction
between and amongst people and things.
He describes some of the objects in New
Physical Consequences, such as his 3-Way Confessional, "Device"
(2008), as being “prop-like, almost like they should be
on a stage” or as “works of fiction” that have
been created in a process not unlike traditional product design
but that fit unexpected scenarios, inspiring heightened awareness
of space, boundaries, and proximity.
In describing his work and intentions, Gavin
frequently mentions the concept of orchestrating, corralling or
composing people within a physical space, often in unnatural or
unexpected proximity. This concept is evident in "Facilitator"
(2008), a metal structure designed to facilitate discussion or
debate amongst people standing within a confined space—divided
by a metal structure, yet still closer to one another than might
be expected in a situation of casual discourse. In this case,
the object leaves the impression with the viewer that a great
deal of activity can or is happening in a small space.
“I like this idea of composing and orchestration.
Those are things that are really fascinating to me. I’m
setting up these divisions or objects that in a way bring [people]
closer together than would typically be natural. The object facilitates
an unusual reaction,” Gavin says.
In another work, “Basic
Boundaries” (2008), Gavin uses
the division of physical space to corral people within an enclosure
that may be perceived as a barrier from the outside, but from
within creates a sense of openness and movement—a “play
of enclosure and openness.”
By creating structures and objects that
influence interactions, Gavin also seeks to explore new typologies
of objects--to create a use or perception that one wouldn’t
expect from a specific object. At the same time, Gavin doesn’t
want the objects to obstruct or impede the perception of interaction.
“I think we’re very fascinated
by objects but I think ultimately, I do want the objects to kind
of disappear in a way,…not disappear but perform a certain
function and what’s left is, again, kind of this idea of
physical interactions,” he explains.
While Gavin’s work explores boundaries
and composition of people or things within physical space using
designed objects, Muecke’s work focuses
on exploring the material, physical and humanistic realms of our
environment and surroundings.
Muecke, in describing his
work and process, talks of “merging humanistic, spiritual
and material realms” and of negotiating these three aspects
to create an object that exemplifies what he describes as a “wholeness”
that results from a successful negotiation of these three priorities.
In exploring the physical world and
what makes us human, Muecke’s works act
as tests—explorations of many aspects of the physical world,
from physics to natural phenomenon. His work incorporates fire,
heat, light and shadow to explore how we, as humans, relate to
our physical world.
His ‘tests’ of materials and the
physical world result in objects that challenge the audience’s
expectations. Muecke sees this as worth exploring as “the
physical is our primary way of understanding what‘s around
[us].” In addition, Muecke explores situations, objects
and elements that are not clearly defined or spaces that are not
clearly delineated. In testing these situations, Muecke knowingly
sets up perceptions that may be undefined or ambiguous.
“I very much enjoy the fact that
[the object] can be meaningful to someone in a very particular
way and also to someone else in a very different way. I’m
not trying to say ‘this form is meant to be this exact thing’.”
This notion of kind of ‘in-between’ place or realms
is where, to me, the greatest creativity lies or the greatest
potential lies--not belonging to this and not belonging to that,
but belonging to this kind of margin,” Muecke explains.
With an educational and professional
background in architecture, Muecke selected Cranbrook’s
graduate program in 3D Design to explore how principles of architecture
can be applied to other creative work and to indulge his desire
to create objects in a more immediate way than he had in his architectural
experiences. His process includes drawings, models, experiments
with materials and often many iterations and tests of the concepts
he seeks to present in his objects.
While he negotiates the materials and
the physical forces at work, he does not overly concern himself
with what exactly the object is or will be, or even if it will
‘work,’ until late in his process. Some of his work,
such as a small copper footstool is, by his own admission, ‘ridiculous,’
but it presents a challenge to typology and surprises viewers
by its seeming lack of true function in a real scenario.
“Ultimately, I’m always interested
in not creating a form first or a meaningful form. I’m not
kind of stylistically driven by certain preoccupations with curved
things, or straight things, or the material. I’m interested
in taking circumstance and context of multiple things and kind
of [working] at them to produce a form,” says Muecke.
For both Gavin and Muecke, New Physical Consequences
at Re:View Contemporary represents an important opportunity to
position their work in a new setting, outside the more insulated
Cranbrook environment.
“Ultimately, it’s a test
to see whether these things work the way I want them to. Whether
they do what I intend them to,” Gavin explains.
In addition to positioning the works in a
gallery setting and allowing a new audience to interact with the
work, Muecke looks to the show to test the work on a different
level. “It’s a test for me. Not just in the perception
of the work but in the formulation of the work,” says Muecke.
Gavin and Muecke break away from fixed
models of design in their work, breaking some of the conventions
or expectations of product or object design as well as of their
furniture design and architecture backgrounds. The work causes
the viewer to relate again to basic types of relationships: the
materials, the scale of things and the very basic understanding
of objects and physical space.
|